While understanding the exercise of legal competence is generally a universal component of a SOFA, more detailed administrative and operational issues can also be included. A SOFA may, for example, look at the wearing of uniforms by the armed forces while it is away from military installations, taxes and royalties, with weapons by U.S. personnel, the use of radio frequencies, driver`s license requirements and customs regulations. A SOFA provides the legal framework for the day-to-day operation of U.S. personnel during a foreign country. Most CANAPES are bilateral agreements; they can therefore be adapted to the specific needs of the staff working in that country. On May 23, 2005, President Hamid Karzai and President Bush issued a “joint statement” in which they presented a future agreement between the two countries.60 It provides that the U.S. military in Afghanistan “must organize, train, equip and support the Afghan security forces” until Afghanistan has developed its own capabilities and “advise on the adoption of appropriate measures in the event that Afghanistan perceives its territorial integrity. Independence or security is threatened or threatened. The statement does not mention the status of U.S.
forces in Afghanistan, but if an agreement is reached in accordance with the declaration, an agreement on the status of the armed forces can be expected to be reached. In August 2008, shortly after the US airstrikes apparently resulted in civilian casualties, President Karzai called for a review of the presence of all foreign forces in Afghanistan and the conclusion of formal SOFS with the countries concerned.61 However, it does not appear clear that the parties have begun formal negotiations that could lead to an updated sofa. This announcement became a source of interest to Congress115, in part following statements by Bush administration officials that such an agreement would not be submitted to the legislative branch for approval, although the United States may have been required to provide “security guarantees” to Iraq.116 Several hearings were held at the 110th Congress on the proposed security agreement. At the end of 2007, Congress passed the Member State Defence Emerging Act, 117 In October 2008, Congress passed the Duncan Hunter National Def Authorenseization Act for fiscal year 2009. , which requires a report from the Chairman to the House of Representatives and Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services Committees on any agreement between the United States and Iraq that addresses certain matters, including security guarantees or U.S. commitments, rights and the status of the United States.